For a better experience on MUBI, update your browser.

James Cameron’s “Avatar”

I don’t know why it should come as a surprise to anyone that writer/director James Cameron should continue to own, or, as the kids today say, PWN, the science-fiction/fantasy genre in cinema. After all, he single-handedly rejuvenated said genre with pretty much zero money and plenty of imagination and filmic ingenuity with 1984’s The Terminator; made the Ultimate Sci-Fi Smash-Bang War Movie, Non Ironic Division, with 1986’s utterly awesome Aliens (the prize in Ironic Division goes to Verhoeven’s Starship Troopers, which Aliens made possible anyway), screwed around with the Terminator character in ways that ought to have been utterly unconscionable, and probably were, and made a colossal entertainment out of the misbegotten enterprise Terminator 2 (1991) anyway, and then…stopped doing science-fiction/fantasy films, unfortunately. Yes, the Bond meets Austrian-Dubbed Father Knows Best hybrid True Lies (1994) did contain some spectacularly far-fetched set pieces that could have come out of an even more acid-damaged version of Nick Fury than Jim Steranko ever essayed, but its curdled humor made it a lot less fun than it might have been, And then there’s  1997’s Titanic, his last feature film and in a way as much of a fantasy as anything he’d ever done, and a massive cinematic spectacle, but…

But not what I want from a Cameron movie, precisely. (And I know I’ve left 1989’s The Abyss out of my Unified Cameron Field Theory, but what can I do?) What I really love about Cameron’s sci-fi work is that it baldly reveals that one of his key visual influences is comics pioneer Jack Kirby, he of the galactic concepts, massive double-truck panoramas, and the craziest kineticism that was ever contained within none-moving frames, that is, comic book panels. Watching the camera pans going over the desolate planet landscape filling up with defense machinery in Aliens was like looking at a trademark Kirby two-page post splash vision come to life. It wasn’t just the composition and the larger than life humans; it was the hypertrophied design of the weapons and the air, land, and sometimes sea craft. A crazy, violent universe, made all the more exhilarating and weird and funny in that both Kirby and Cameron use the violence of their vision to proselytize peace?

Yeah, pretty much. So Cameron’s long awaited, much-second-guessed Avatar, a ridiculously expensive-to-produce, CGI-driven, 3-D epic, works best as an insanely expanded Kirby-esque cinematic spectacle. The comic-book analogy is in fact stronger than the video game one, and the video game one is the easiest to grab for by folks who don’t know their Kirby. But that’s life. Contrary to what a lot of people insisted on gleaning from the trailers, this isn’t just a story of resources-hungry earthlings attempting to rape a planet made up of a lot of wussy rain forests and populated by 12-foot-tall tree-hugging humanoids with blue skin and tails and organic USB ports/connectors. Because, among other things, the planet is also populated by ten truckloads of really cool creatures, inspired by sci-fi pics as diverse as The Valley of Gwangi, Mothra, The Killer Shrews, and more. (Yes, The Killer Shrews. Turns out killer shrews are better done via computer than by putting ratty fake fur over skinny dogs. Who knew?) These multi-colored marauders are, like the tree-huggers themselves (called the Na’vi) tied to the planet Pandora by means of a neural network whose nodes are the trees in which the humanoid tribes make their home. It is not entirely unexpected when the Na’vi “avatar” of disabled journeyman soldier Jake Sully (that he is only one consonant away from being the protagonist of De Palma’s Body Double really has to be a coincidence), sent to research and then pretty much sell out the Na’vi for Earth’s corporate mineral interests, finds himself attracted to the savage but wise people’s ways and beliefs. There are touches here recognizable from Dances With Wolves, and The Matrix as well. It is neither a stretch not an insult to say that there is very little original about Cameron’s plotting, but one should note that he commendably declines to rub your nose in its Joseph Campbell-isms. What is unusual about the picture is the ferocity with which Sully (a solid Sam Worthington) goes native. This is not a movie with a lot of sympathy for earth people, or rather, Americans, specifically Caucasian ones. Which we’ll get to a bit later, and is kind of funny when you think about it.

Cameron sets up all of his plot mechanisms (the perquisites of greed and power and trust and betrayal, essentially) and stock characters (gruff-but-lovable scientist, loathsome corporate scum, seemingly stand-up but essentially heartless and bigoted military man, etc.)  with wonderful efficiency in the first 20 minutes or so, then lets loose with a series of magnificent visual set pieces that put the viewer in another world. One which the viewer may choose to believe in, or not. One might find the gawky grace and wide-open faces of the Na’vi unconvincing if one is so inclined. I found the creatures, a mix of live-action acting and motion-capture-guided CGI, rather ingratiating. What are finally undeniable, and breathtaking, are the varied action sequences, from the ritual of capturing the flying creature called the Ikran to the tragic but still awe-inspiring deforestation-by-human-explosives scenes, which kind of blow Apocalypse Now away. And isn’t it funny how so many putatively anti-war pictures have such kick-ass scenes of things blowing up, no? The fluid assuredness with which Cameron mixes mind-bending settings (a floating mountain range, for instance) with fast-moving but always cinematically coherent action…and then tops it off with 3-D effects that are rarely ostentatious but always enhance what’s going on; well, yes, all this combines into something that, as they say, you’ve never seen before.

The picture’s not perfect. Learning your visuals from Jack Kirby is one thing, but too often it sounds like Cameron learned to write dialogue from the guy too; Cameron’s occasional genius for the perfect dumb catchphrase notwithstanding, the talk here, as in his other pictures, is mostly leaden and on the nose. (Which may just mean that the occasional perfect dumb catchphrase is all you need.) I love Michelle Rodriguez as much as the next guy (maybe more), but honestly, why do filmmakers even bother giving her characters any name other than hers anymore? Here she plays, no, you’ll never guess, a foxy, hard-boiled chopper pilot. That’s not really a fault, actually.

“Don’t believe what you’ve heard,” a lot of people are saying about Avatar today, and we’ll be nice and not make too much of the attendant irony that many of the people saying that were actually responsible for what you’ve heard. This is a movie that is changing minds all over: “OSCAR BOUND,” Matt Drudge’s website is saying in all caps even as we speak. This despite the fact that it wouldn’t be a stretch to interpret the picture as a call for worldwide jihad, and its hero Jake Sully as a more competent, successful John Walker Lindh. Okay, I’m playing here. A bit. But man, those buzz phrases “shock and awe,” “fight terror with terror” and “preemptive war” didn’t come out of nowhere. We can discuss this further after you’ve seen the picture. Which you ought to.

Glad you liked it Glenn, like you I feel sci-fi is Cameron’s natural ‘ghetto’ but… no love for The Abyss? I thought it blew Batman and Indiana Jones off the screen back in ‘89. Yes it’s CE3K underwater and has corny dialogue, but the ambition behind it is magnificent and Ed Harris turns in one of the most interesting lead performances in a summer blockbuster, well, ever. Still, it’s been a long 18 year wait for a new Cameron sci-fi, can’t wait to see this Wednesday night. Great to hear Cameron hasn’t lost his mojo.
I’m struggling to think of a summer blockbuster in the last ten years that was anywhere near The Abyss for excitement, spectacle and jaw-dropping craftsmanship?
I must admit I’m kind of excited for this…
Hey! Glenn Kenny stole my theory that James Cameron is the Jack Kirby of Movies!
Poor Mac.
I think it was J. Hoberman who originally pointed out the Cameron-is-Kirby analogue back with ALIENS was released, and perhaps even earlier. Not to take any credit away from Glenn, who clearly knows his Steranko from a hole in the ground. Just sayin: Cameron’s debt to THE NEW GODS creator is nothing new.
Yes, it was Hoberman—my critical idol at that time, and my model during my Premiere tenure (I never really touched the hem of his garment, but everybody’s got to have a goal, no?)—who first made the comparison in print, and I ought to have mentioned him.
First paragraph: single-handedly filmic ingenuity Ultimate Sci-Fi Smash-Bang War Movie utterly awesome utterly unconscionable colossal entertainment massive cinematic spectacle Exactly. Cameron’s ‘bigger-is-better’-attitude shows insecurity, not strength. Where Scott’s ‘Alien’ is efficient, Cameron’s ‘Aliens’ is just too much of everything. In consequence, it’s less thrilling, less entertaining, less intelligent.
Alien is more artful than Aliens (obviously). Aliens is more entertaining and thrilling than Alien (and pretty much every other sci-fi action movie i’ve ever seen!).
Honestly, your description of the plot makes me want to beat Cameron with a stack of Ed Zwick’s scripts. I deeply love Jack Kirby, and I’m looking forward to the spectacle, but somebody convince him he needs to run his scripts by somebody else, first.
“This is not a movie with a lot of sympathy for earth people, or rather, Americans, specifically Caucasian ones.” Interesting that they should mention that the humans in the film are Caucasians. Some have predicted that by whatever future time frame the movie is imagining, the human race would have interbred to the point where the will be no more Caucasians. Just something to ponder.
Aliens actually has characters, which is a definite improvement over Ridley Scott’s movie. Avatar, on the other hand, feels to me like a step backwards. Wayyyyy backwards. And I think movies should be political, but that they should also not be one-sided and nuanced.
There is very little that Aliens does better than Alien. In my estimation, it’s a useless comparison since their genres are so drastically different. Aliens is a jingoistic chest-thumper closer to Red Dawn and Blackhawk Down.
Interesting how different the ideologies of ALIENS and AVATAR are, yet I’m presuming the eco-conciousness of AVATAR is strictly for the purpose of providing a conflict in the narrative and not something Cameron feels deeply about. Anyone know?
Ben, Cameron is a big fan of science and the natural world, especially marine biology. It’s not too hard for me to believe that he cares deeply about the environment. Also, here’s a video made in 2007 which sort of answers your question: Avatar’s political perspective is in line with the left wing ideology that’s been present in his work through his entire career, from The Terminator to The Abyss to Titanic.
Cameron, and most of Hollywood, now being massively financed with market favors from the most awesomely genocidal regime in human history —-across the Pacific. That’s right --70 million people ‘missing’ in ‘peacetime’ that you won’t be hearing a peep ab out from Hollywood or America’s suck-up n’ soldout media. And you were wondering why things have been so dumbed down… Wonder no more…
At the premiere James Cameron told The Sun… ““The point is that we are devastating habitat and biodiversity at a terrible rate. We are causing a global climate change that’s going to be absolutely devastating to the coral reefs. Science is unable to keep up with our industrial society. We are destroying species faster than we can classify them. We are destroying the food chain faster than we can understand it. The politicians are over in Copenhagen talking about climate change now – but there are other issues as well.” He’s used solar-power at his home for 10 years and is working on installing wind-power as well.
I’m debating whether or not to see this film in 3d, IMAX or standard – because I’ve never really been able to stand the first two, for one reason or another. But, on the other hand, so much of the film relies on the illusion of immersion and forwardness that these two create for the viewer, something that would be diminished in a normal theater, I imagine. So, it’s a real toss up. Although, the whole matter of this costing upwards of 350 million dollars during an economic depression – and contributing to such a thing by seeing it – is a little unsettling. Just a little.
“Avatar” is set in 2154. I doubt everyone will have interbred till we’re all mocha or whatever by then.
how mutch will it caust
to do something like in the movie
its a great wonder of hollywood
the great hollywood movie…..excellent
this is amazing movie………
Nice one….
Seriously. This is an awful movie.
nice movie .i like it personally.
nice mobi
The Terminator isn’t original. It was sued for copywrite infringment and the man sueing won the lawsuit. The Terminator rips off two old 60’s Outer Limits episodes. So yes plenty of imagination, but not his, the imagination of a writer named Harlin Elison. Cameron is given wayyyyy too much credit as a storyteller. He can establish great pace, & character but he doesn’t write original stories in the least. Almost all of his films are stolen to my knowledge minus probably “The Abyss” & “True Lies” but if I dig deeper I might find something.

Please to add a new comment.

Previous Features