Shhh... You've found us.
Welcome to The Auteurs.
Your online cinema. Anytime, anywhere.
 

Edouard Hill

about 1 year ago

So, I (almost) completely enjoyed this visual assult, and I was wondering what everyone on here thought of it, what did you make of the deranged patchwork of scenes that collectively IS Sweet Movie. I believe that this is most definitly a film which warrents discussion, so let’s start one.

Bobby Wise

about 1 year ago

classic makavejev. serbian cutting used to the extreme. assaults on standards of taste. political commentary. black humor.

this film is a total contradiction for me. there are some scenes i literally can’t watch (the pissing and shitting stuff). and one scene which i think is the greatest thing makavejev ever put together (the katyn massacre).

“sweet movie” is subversive, anarchic cinema, in form and content. maybe this is what godard meant when he said “the problem is not to make political films, but to make films politically.”

Edouard Hill

9 months ago

Wow, so I just watched this film again, this time with some unsuspecting roommates, one of which left after the golden penis, two of which enjoyed it but were a little lost at times, and two of which were completely disturbed. Once again I found myself intrigued and even after watching the interview with Makavejev a bit confused myself… hasn’t anyone else on here seen this movie? Doesn’t anyone other than Bobby and I wanna discuss?

Bobby Wise

9 months ago

people dont really know much about makavejev’s career in general. he doesnt spark a lot of interest. he’s a little bit more obscure than your average obscure eastern european director. i didnt know anything about him myself until 2 years ago. i hope these criterion releases will change that though. plus, the first book-length study of his films has recently been published.

Ryan Estabro​oks

9 months ago

Loved “Sweet Movie”, laughed my ass off at it which surprised me a lot, I didn’t expect it to be so funny. But it is great, one of my fave Criterion movies. The story and just overall craziness of it kept me glued to the tv.

Bobby Wise

9 months ago

then you’ll love the rest of makavejev’s work. humor is very important to him.

Edouard Hill

9 months ago

Yeah, I have to say that I laughed (really hard) out loud at a lot of the film, while my roommates were mortified with their mouths agape.

prudenc​e

9 months ago

you might want to check out some more of his work, especially LOVE AFFAIR and WR: MYSTERIES OF THE ORGANISM. Both are better than SWEET MOVIE.

Here are some articles from the internet…

Four Films by Dusan Makavejev
http://www.brightlightsfilm.com/33/makavejev.html

An Interview with Dusan Makavejev
http://archive.sensesofcinema.com/contents/00/11/makavejev.html

WR:Mysteries of the Organism
http://archive.sensesofcinema.com/contents/books/00/11/wr.html

Bobby Wise

9 months ago

the birth of the style of “sweet movie” can be found in “love affair.”

but anyway, makavejev is a total original. i haven’t seen any other films like his.

Jasmine

9 months ago

This movie was shown to me at university a few weeks ago.. It’s great the tutor got away with it actually.
I think this film is amazing.. I’m actually writing an essay on it right now. Everything about it is just taken to the extreme.

Bobby Wise

9 months ago

again, thanks due to criterion. its great to see that hes already experiencing a reemergence and being taught in universities.

richmon​dhill

5 months ago

I notice Eclipse DVD are releasing a triple box-set in October, comprising Man Is Not a Bird, Love Affair and Innocence Unprotected:

http://www.criterion.com/boxsets/668

Having enjoyed SM and WR: Mysteries of the Organism, I’m looking forward to viewing these earlier works and seeing if I can trace the kernel of the freewheeling spirit of the later films. It’s a shame Makavejev couldn’t progress it further beyond SM, but I suppose that film was something of a last gasp of that short period of cinematic head-on colisions between sexual liberation, political tracts and pyscho-trippiness, all laced together through an idiosyncratic directorial style. Of course, what is more was the budgets made available for these films by American studios (largely unthinkable since the mid to late seventies) e.g. Roeg’s Performance, Fellini Satyricon, Russell’s The Devils, Holy Mountain, etc. (none directly related but strange biggish budget bedfellows nevertheless).

Bobby Wise

5 months ago

we discussed that makavejev box set on some other thread. cant remember the name of it. i cant wait for it to come out. those films deserve to be known, in addition to the general brilliance of makavejev’s career.

youll definitely be able to trace the kernel. but “man is not a bird” sort of stands apart from the rest. youll see.

as far as the end of his career (even the beginning), makavejev only worked for an american studio once. so that wasnt so much a factor of his general demise. his fuse just burned short and bright, thats all. but he had a ton of activity in the 50s and 60s (mostly shorts and docs). so he left behind a lot of great work. a majority of it just wasnt feature film work.

richmon​dhill

5 months ago

The DVD set is called Free Radical, which sounds pretty spot-on.

richmon​dhill

5 months ago

The DVD set is called Free Radical, which sounds pretty spot-on.

Reply To Topic